Export limit exceeded: 335508 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 335508 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (335508 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-25406 | 2 Cdome, Comodo | 3 Comodo Dome Firewall, Comodo Dome Firewall, Dome Firewall | 2026-03-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by manipulating the organization parameter. Attackers can send POST requests to the korugan/cmclient endpoint with script payloads in the organization parameter to execute arbitrary JavaScript in users' browsers. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25405 | 2 Cdome, Comodo | 3 Comodo Dome Firewall, Comodo Dome Firewall, Dome Firewall | 2026-03-02 | 7.2 High |
| Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the newLicense parameter. Attackers can send POST requests to the license activation endpoint with script payloads in the newLicense field to execute arbitrary JavaScript in administrators' browsers. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25404 | 2 Cdome, Comodo | 3 Comodo Dome Firewall, Comodo Dome Firewall, Dome Firewall | 2026-03-02 | 6.4 Medium |
| Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input through admin management parameters. Attackers can inject script payloads in the admin_name, name, and surname parameters via POST requests to the /korugan/admins endpoint, which are stored and executed when administrators access the interface. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25403 | 2 Cdome, Comodo | 3 Comodo Dome Firewall, Comodo Dome Firewall, Dome Firewall | 2026-03-02 | 6.4 Medium |
| Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the comment parameter. Attackers can inject JavaScript code through the admin_profiles endpoint that executes in the browsers of other users who view the affected page. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25402 | 2 Cdome, Comodo | 3 Comodo Dome Firewall, Comodo Dome Firewall, Dome Firewall | 2026-03-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the username parameter. Attackers can send POST requests to the login endpoint with script payloads in the username field to execute arbitrary JavaScript in users' browsers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27154 | 1 Discourse | 1 Discourse | 2026-03-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, a user full name can be evaluated as raw HTML when the following settings are set: `display_name_on_posts` => true; and `prioritize_username_in_ux` => false. Editing a post of a malicious user would trigger an XSS. Versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 patch the issue. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27153 | 1 Discourse | 1 Discourse | 2026-03-02 | 2.7 Low |
| Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, moderators could export user Chat DMs via the CSV export endpoint by exploiting an overly permissive allowlist in `can_export_entity?`. The method allowed moderators to export any entity not explicitly blocked instead of restricting to an explicit allowlist. Versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 patch the issue. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27638 | 1 Actualbudget | 1 Actual | 2026-03-02 | 7.1 High |
| Actual is a local-first personal finance tool. Prior to version 26.2.1, in multi-user mode (OpenID), the sync API endpoints (`/sync/*`) don't verify that the authenticated user owns or has access to the file being operated on. Any authenticated user can read, modify, and overwrite any other user's budget files by providing their file ID. Version 26.2.1 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28215 | 1 Hoppscotch | 1 Hoppscotch | 2026-03-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| hoppscotch is an open source API development ecosystem. Prior to version 2026.2.0, an unauthenticated attacker can overwrite the entire infrastructure configuration of a self-hosted Hoppscotch instance including OAuth provider credentials and SMTP settings by sending a single HTTP POST request with no authentication. The endpoint POST /v1/onboarding/config has no authentication guard and performs no check on whether onboarding was already completed. A successful exploit allows the attacker to replace the instance's Google/GitHub/Microsoft OAuth application credentials with their own, causing all subsequent user logins via SSO to authenticate against the attacker's OAuth app. The attacker captures OAuth tokens and email addresses of every user who logs in after the exploit. Additionally, the endpoint returns a recovery token that can be used to read all stored secrets in plaintext, including SMTP passwords and any other configured credentials. Version 2026.2.0 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28280 | 1 Jmpsec | 1 Osctrl | 2026-03-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| osctrl is an osquery management solution. Prior to version 0.5.0, a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the `osctrl-admin` on-demand query list. A user with query-level permissions can inject arbitrary JavaScript via the query parameter when running an on-demand query. The payload is stored and executes in the browser of any user (including administrators) who visits the query list page. This can be chained with CSRF token extraction to escalate privileges and take actions as the logged in user. An attacker with query-level permissions (the lowest privilege tier) can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browsers of all users who view the query list. Depending on their level of access, it can lead to full platform compromise if an administrator executes the payload. The issue is fixed in osctrl `v0.5.0`. As a workaround, restrict query-level permissions to trusted users, monitor query list for suspicious payloads, and/or review osctrl user accounts for unauthorized administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25851 | 1 Chargemap | 1 Chargemap.com | 2026-03-02 | 9.4 Critical |
| WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger. Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and corruption of charging network data reported to the backend. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20792 | 1 Chargemap | 1 Chargemap.com | 2026-03-02 | 7.5 High |
| The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or misrouting legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25711 | 1 Chargemap | 1 Chargemap.com | 2026-03-02 | 7.3 High |
| The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25778 | 2 Switch Ev, Swtchenergy | 2 Swtchenergy.com, Swtchenergy.com | 2026-03-02 | 7.3 High |
| The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20791 | 1 Chargemap | 1 Chargemap.com | 2026-03-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Charging station authentication identifiers are publicly accessible via web-based mapping platforms. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20781 | 1 Cloudcharge | 1 Cloudcharge.se | 2026-03-02 | 9.4 Critical |
| WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger. Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and corruption of charging network data reported to the backend. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20895 | 1 Ev2go | 1 Ev2go.io | 2026-03-02 | 7.3 High |
| The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22890 | 1 Ev2go | 1 Ev2go.io | 2026-03-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Charging station authentication identifiers are publicly accessible via web-based mapping platforms. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27767 | 2 Switch Ev, Swtchenergy | 2 Swtchenergy.com, Swtchenergy.com | 2026-03-02 | 9.4 Critical |
| WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger. Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and corruption of charging network data reported to the backend. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27129 | 1 Craftcms | 2 Craft Cms, Craftcms | 2026-03-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Craft is a content management system (CMS). In versions 4.5.0-RC1 through 4.16.18 and 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.8.22, the SSRF validation in Craft CMS’s GraphQL Asset mutation uses `gethostbyname()`, which only resolves IPv4 addresses. When a hostname has only AAAA (IPv6) records, the function returns the hostname string itself, causing the blocklist comparison to always fail and completely bypassing SSRF protection. This is a bypass of the security fix for CVE-2025-68437. Exploitation requires GraphQL schema permissions for editing assets in the `<VolumeName>` volume and creating assets in the `<VolumeName>` volume. These permissions may be granted to authenticated users with appropriate GraphQL schema access and/or Public Schema (if misconfigured with write permissions). Versions 4.16.19 and 5.8.23 patch the issue. | ||||