Export limit exceeded: 338340 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (338340 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-30955 | 1 Forceu | 1 Gokapi | 2026-03-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| Gokapi is a self-hosted file sharing server with automatic expiration and encryption support. Prior to 2.2.4, An API endpoint accepts unbounded request bodies without any size limit. An authenticated user can cause an OOM kill and complete service disruption for all users. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60012 | 1 Apache | 1 Livy | 2026-03-16 | 6.3 Medium |
| Malicious configuration can lead to unauthorized file access in Apache Livy. This issue affects Apache Livy 0.7.0 and 0.8.0 when connecting to Apache Spark 3.1 or later. A request that includes a Spark configuration value supported from Apache Spark version 3.1 can lead to users gaining access to files they do not have permissions to. For the vulnerability to be exploitable, the user needs to have access to Apache Livy's REST or JDBC interface and be able to send requests with arbitrary Spark configuration values. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.9.0 or later, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31949 | 1 Danny-avila | 1 Libre Chat | 2026-03-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Prior to 0.8.3-rc1, a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the DELETE /api/convos endpoint that allows an authenticated attacker to crash the Node.js server process by sending malformed requests. The DELETE /api/convos route handler attempts to destructure req.body.arg without validating that it exists. The server crashes due to an unhandled TypeError that bypasses Express error handling middleware and triggers process.exit(1). This vulnerability is fixed in 0.8.3-rc1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12453 | 1 Opentext | 1 Vertica | 2026-03-16 | N/A |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in OpenText™ Vertica allows Reflected XSS. The vulnerability could lead to Reflected XSS attack of cross-site scripting in Vertica management console application.This issue affects Vertica: from 10.0 through 10.X, from 11.0 through 11.X, from 12.0 through 12.X, from 23.0 through 23.X, from 24.0 through 24.X, from 25.1.0 through 25.1.X, from 25.2.0 through 25.2.X, from 25.3.0 through 25.3.X. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12454 | 1 Opentext | 1 Vertica | 2026-03-16 | N/A |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in OpenText™ Vertica allows Reflected XSS. The vulnerability could lead to Reflected XSS attack of cross-site scripting in Vertica management console application.This issue affects Vertica: from 10.0 through 10.X, from 11.0 through 11.X, from 12.0 through 12.X, from 23.0 through 23.X, from 24.0 through 24.X, from 25.1.0 through 25.1.X. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12455 | 1 Opentext | 1 Vertica | 2026-03-16 | N/A |
| Observable response discrepancy vulnerability in OpenText™ Vertica allows Password Brute Forcing. The vulnerability could lead to Password Brute Forcing in Vertica management console application.This issue affects Vertica: from 10.0 through 10.X, from 11.0 through 11.X, from 12.0 through 12.X. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13779 | 1 Abb | 2 Awin Gw100 Rev.2, Awin Gw120 | 2026-03-16 | 8.3 High |
| Missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in ABB AWIN GW100 rev.2, ABB AWIN GW120.This issue affects AWIN GW100 rev.2: 2.0-0, 2.0-1; AWIN GW120: 1.2-0, 1.2-1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14483 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2026-03-16 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_1, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_1, and 6.2.2.0 could disclose sensitive host information to authenticated users in responses that could be used in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14504 | 1 Ibm | 2 Sterling B2b Integrator, Sterling File Gateway | 2026-03-16 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_1, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_1, and 6.2.2.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71263 | 1 At&t Bell Labs | 1 Unix | 2026-03-16 | 7.4 High |
| In UNIX Fourth Research Edition (v4), the su command is vulnerable to a buffer overflow due to the 'password' variable having a fixed size of 100 bytes. A local user can exploit this to gain root privileges. It is unlikely that UNIX v4 is running anywhere outside of a very small number of lab environments. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8766 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Data Foundation | 2026-03-16 | 6.4 Medium |
| A container privilege escalation flaw was found in certain Multi-Cloud Object Gateway Core images. This issue stems from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during build time. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, can leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container | ||||
| CVE-2026-1668 | 1 Tp-link | 39 Sg2005p-pd, Sg2008, Sg2008p and 36 more | 2026-03-16 | N/A |
| The web interface on multiple Omada switches does not adequately validate certain external inputs, which may lead to out-of-bound memory access when processing crafted requests. Under specific conditions, this flaw may result in unintended command execution.<br>An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the affected interface may cause memory corruption, service instability, or information disclosure. Successful exploitation may allow remote code execution or denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1704 | 2 Croixhaug, Wordpress | 2 Appointment Booking Calendar — Simply Schedule Appointments Booking Plugin, Wordpress | 2026-03-16 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Appointment Booking Calendar — Simply Schedule Appointments Booking Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.9.29. This is due to the `get_item_permissions_check` method granting access to users with the `ssa_manage_appointments` capability without validating staff ownership of the requested appointment. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with custom-level access and above (users granted the ssa_manage_appointments capability, such as Team Members), to view appointment records belonging to other staff members and access sensitive customer personally identifiable information via the appointment ID parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22183 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-16 | 6.1 Medium |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the inline comment preview functionality that allows authenticated users to inject malicious scripts by submitting comments with unescaped content. Attackers with unfiltered_html capabilities can inject JavaScript directly through comment content rendered in the AJAX response from the getLastInlineComments() function in class.WpdiscuzHelperAjax.php without proper HTML escaping. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22191 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains a shortcode injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes by including them in comment content sent via email notifications. Attackers can inject shortcodes like [contact-form-7] or [user_meta] in comments, which are executed server-side when the WpdiscuzHelperEmail class processes notifications through do_shortcode() before wp_mail(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-22192 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-16 | 6.1 Medium |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript by importing a crafted options file with unescaped customCss field values. Attackers can supply a malicious JSON import file containing script payloads in the customCss parameter that execute on every page when rendered through the options handler without proper sanitization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22193 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-16 | 8.1 High |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the getAllSubscriptions() function where string parameters lack proper quote escaping in SQL queries. Attackers can inject malicious SQL code through email, activation_key, subscription_date, and imported_from parameters to manipulate database queries and extract sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22199 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-16 | 5.3 Medium |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains a vote manipulation vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate comment votes by obtaining fresh nonces and bypassing rate limiting through client-controlled headers. Attackers can vary User-Agent headers to reset rate limits, request nonces from the unauthenticated wpdGetNonce endpoint, and vote multiple times using IP rotation or reverse proxy header manipulation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22201 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-16 | 5.3 Medium |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the getIP() function that allows attackers to bypass IP-based rate limiting and ban enforcement by trusting untrusted HTTP headers. Attackers can set HTTP_CLIENT_IP or HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR headers to spoof their IP address and circumvent security controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22202 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-16 | 8.1 High |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to delete all comments associated with an email address by crafting a malicious GET request with a valid HMAC key. Attackers can embed the deletecomments action URL in image tags or other resources to trigger permanent deletion of comments without user confirmation or POST-based CSRF protection. | ||||