Export limit exceeded: 338637 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (338637 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-27748 | 2 Avira, Gen Digital | 3 Avira Internet Security Suite, Internet Security, Avira Internet Security | 2026-03-13 | 7.8 High |
| Avira Internet Security contains an improper link resolution vulnerability in the Software Updater component. During the update process, a privileged service running as SYSTEM deletes a file under C:\\ProgramData without validating whether the path resolves through a symbolic link or reparse point. A local attacker can create a malicious link to redirect the delete operation to an arbitrary file, resulting in deletion of attacker-chosen files with SYSTEM privileges. This may lead to local privilege escalation, denial of service, or system integrity compromise depending on the targeted file and operating system configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27749 | 2 Avira, Gen Digital | 3 Avira Internet Security Suite, Internet Security, Avira Internet Security | 2026-03-13 | 7.8 High |
| Avira Internet Security contains a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in the System Speedup component. The Avira.SystemSpeedup.RealTimeOptimizer.exe process, which runs with SYSTEM privileges, deserializes data from a file located in C:\\ProgramData using .NET BinaryFormatter without implementing input validation or deserialization safeguards. Because the file can be created or modified by a local user in default configurations, an attacker can supply a crafted serialized payload that is deserialized by the privileged process, resulting in arbitrary code execution as SYSTEM. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27750 | 2 Avira, Gen Digital | 3 Avira Internet Security Suite, Internet Security, Avira Internet Security | 2026-03-13 | 7.8 High |
| Avira Internet Security contains a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerability in the Optimizer component. A privileged service running as SYSTEM identifies directories for cleanup during a scan phase and subsequently deletes them during a separate cleanup phase without revalidating the target path. A local attacker can replace a previously scanned directory with a junction or reparse point before deletion occurs, causing the privileged process to delete an unintended system location. This may result in deletion of protected files or directories and can lead to local privilege escalation, denial of service, or system integrity compromise depending on the affected target. | ||||
| CVE-2021-35486 | 1 Nokia | 2 Impact, Impact Mobile | 2026-03-13 | 8.1 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nokia IMPACT through 19.11.2.10-20210118042150283 allows a remote attacker to import and overwrite the entire application configuration. Specifically, in /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import, neither the X-CSRF-NONCE HTTP header nor the CSRF-NONCE cookie is validated. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22866 | 2 Ens.domains, Ensdomains | 2 Ethereum Name Service, Ens-contracts | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is a distributed, open, and extensible naming system based on the Ethereum blockchain. In versions 1.6.2 and prior, the `RSASHA256Algorithm` and `RSASHA1Algorithm` contracts fail to validate PKCS#1 v1.5 padding structure when verifying RSA signatures. The contracts only check if the last 32 (or 20) bytes of the decrypted signature match the expected hash. This enables Bleichenbacher's 2006 signature forgery attack against DNS zones using RSA keys with low public exponents (e=3). Two ENS-supported TLDs (.cc and .name) use e=3 for their Key Signing Keys, allowing any domain under these TLDs to be fraudulently claimed on ENS without DNS ownership. Apatch was merged at commit c76c5ad0dc9de1c966443bd946fafc6351f87587. Possible workarounds include deploying the patched contracts and pointing DNSSECImpl.setAlgorithm to the deployed contract. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27704 | 3 Dart, Dart-lang, Flutter | 4 Dart Software Development Kit, Flutter, Sdk and 1 more | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| The Dart and Flutter SDKs provide software development kits for the Dart programming language. In versions of the Dart SDK prior to 3.11.0 and the Flutter SDK prior to version 3.41.0, when the pub client (`dart pub` and `flutter pub`) extracts a package in the pub cache, a malicious package archive can have files extracted outside the destination directory in the `PUB_CACHE`. A fix has been landed in commit 26c6985c742593d081f8b58450f463a584a4203a. By normalizing the file path before writing file, the attacker can no longer traverse up via a symlink. This patch is released in Dart 3.11.0 and Flutter 3.41.0.vAll packages on pub.dev have been vetted for this vulnerability. New packages are no longer allowed to contain symlinks. The pub client itself doesn't upload symlinks, but duplicates the linked entry, and has been doing this for years. Those whose dependencies are all from pub.dev, third-party repositories trusted to not contain malicious code, or git dependencies are not affected by this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48418 | 1 Fortinet | 6 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer Cloud, Fortianalyzercloud and 3 more | 2026-03-12 | 6.4 Medium |
| A hidden functionality vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, FortiAnalyzer 7.0.0 through 7.0.14, FortiAnalyzer 6.4 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.2, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.10, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.0.1 through 7.0.14, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 6.4 all versions, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, FortiManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.14, FortiManager 6.4 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.3, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.10, FortiManager Cloud 7.0.1 through 7.0.14, FortiManager Cloud 6.4 all versions may allow a remote authenticated read-only admin with CLI access to escalate their privilege via use of a hidden command. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48840 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-03-12 | 5 Medium |
| An authentication bypass by spoofing vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to bypass hostname restrictions via a specially crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49784 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer-bigdata, Fortianalyzer Big Data | 2026-03-12 | 5.6 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 6.4 all versions, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.6.0, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 6.4 all versions, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 6.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53608 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisandbox | 2026-03-12 | 4.6 Medium |
| An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.2, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.7, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions may allow an authenticated privileged attacker to execute code via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54820 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimanager | 2026-03-12 | 7 High |
| A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, FortiManager 6.4 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via crafted requests, if the service is enabled. The success of the attack depends on the ability to bypass the stack protection mechanisms. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2376 | 2 Mirror-registry, Redhat | 3 Quay, Mirror Registry, Quay | 2026-03-12 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in mirror-registry where an authenticated user can trick the system into accessing unintended internal or restricted systems by providing malicious web addresses. When the application processes these addresses, it automatically follows redirects without verifying the final destination, allowing attackers to route requests to systems they should not have access to. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32062 | 1 Openclaw | 2 Openclaw, Voice-call | 2026-03-12 | 7.5 High |
| OpenClaw versions2026.2.21-2 prior to 2026.2.22 and @openclaw/voice-call versions 2026.2.21 prior to 2026.2.22 accept media-stream WebSocket upgrades before stream validation, allowing unauthenticated clients to establish connections. Remote attackers can hold idle pre-authenticated sockets open to consume connection resources and degrade service availability for legitimate streams. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3957 | 1 Xierongwkhd | 1 Weimai-wetapp | 2026-03-12 | 4.7 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in xierongwkhd weimai-wetapp up to 5fe9e8225be4f73f2c5087f134aff657bdf1c6f2. This vulnerability affects the function getLikeMovieList of the file source-code/src/main/java/com/moke/wp/wx_weimai/controller/HomeController.java of the component Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument cat can lead to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3956 | 1 Xierongwkhd | 1 Weimai-wetapp | 2026-03-12 | 4.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in xierongwkhd weimai-wetapp up to 5fe9e8225be4f73f2c5087f134aff657bdf1c6f2. This affects the function getAdmins of the file source-code/src/main/java/com/moke/wp/wx_weimai/controller/admin/Admin_AdminUserController.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument keyword results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3949 | 1 Struktur | 1 Libheif | 2026-03-12 | 3.3 Low |
| A vulnerability was determined in strukturag libheif up to 1.21.2. This affects the function vvdec_push_data2 of the file libheif/plugins/decoder_vvdec.cc of the component HEIF File Parser. Executing a manipulation of the argument size can lead to out-of-bounds read. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called b97c8b5f198b27f375127cd597a35f2113544d03. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3904 | 1 The Gnu C Library | 1 Glibc | 2026-03-12 | 6.2 Medium |
| Calling NSS-backed functions that support caching via nscd may call the nscd client side code and in the GNU C Library version 2.36 under high load on x86_64 systems, the client may call memcmp on inputs that are concurrently modified by other processes or threads and crash. The nscd client in the GNU C Library uses the memcmp function with inputs that may be concurrently modified by another thread, potentially resulting in spurious cache misses, which in itself is not a security issue. However in the GNU C Library version 2.36 an optimized implementation of memcmp was introduced for x86_64 which could crash when invoked with such undefined behaviour, turning this into a potential crash of the nscd client and the application that uses it. This implementation was backported to the 2.35 branch, making the nscd client in that branch vulnerable as well. Subsequently, the fix for this issue was backported to all vulnerable branches in the GNU C Library repository. It is advised that distributions that may have cherry-picked the memcpy SSE2 optimization in their copy of the GNU C Library, also apply the fix to avoid the potential crash in the nscd client. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3848 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 5 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.11 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to make unintended internal requests through proxy environments under certain conditions due to improper input validation in import functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3429 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 5 Keycloak, Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 2 more | 2026-03-12 | 4.2 Medium |
| A flaw was identified in the Account REST API of Keycloak that allows a user authenticated at a lower security level to perform sensitive actions intended only for higher-assurance sessions. Specifically, an attacker who has already obtained a victim’s password can delete the victim’s registered MFA/OTP credential without first proving possession of that factor. The attacker can then register their own MFA device, effectively taking full control of the account. This weakness undermines the intended protection provided by multi-factor authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32128 | 1 Labring | 1 Fastgpt | 2026-03-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| FastGPT is an AI Agent building platform. In 4.14.7 and earlier, FastGPT's Python Sandbox (fastgpt-sandbox) includes guardrails intended to prevent file writes (static detection + seccomp). These guardrails are bypassable by remapping stdout (fd 1) to an arbitrary writable file descriptor using fcntl. After remapping, writing via sys.stdout.write() still satisfies the seccomp rule write(fd==1), enabling arbitrary file creation/overwrite inside the sandbox container despite the intended no file writes restriction. | ||||