| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| CKEditor 5 is a modern JavaScript rich-text editor with an MVC architecture. Prior to version 47.6.0, a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been discovered in the General HTML Support feature. This vulnerability could be triggered by inserting specially crafted markup, leading to unauthorized JavaScript code execution, if the editor instance used an unsafe General HTML Support configuration. This issue has been patched in version 47.6.0. |
| Inappropriate user token revocation due to a logic error in the token revocation endpoint implementation in Cloudfoundry UAA v77.30.0 to v78.7.0 and in Cloudfoundry Deployment v48.7.0 to v54.10.0. |
| Products.isurlinportal is a replacement for isURLInPortal method in Plone. Prior to versions 2.1.0, 3.1.0, and 4.0.0, a url /login?came_from=////evil.example may redirect to an external website after login. This issue has been patched in versions 2.1.0, 3.1.0, and 4.0.0. |
| Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability in hexpm hexpm/hexpm ('Elixir.Hexpm.Accounts.PasswordReset' module) allows Account Takeover.
Password reset tokens generated via the "Reset your password" flow do not expire. When a user requests a password reset, Hex sends an email containing a reset link with a token. This token remains valid indefinitely until used. There is no time-based expiration enforced.
If a user's historical emails are exposed through a data breach (e.g., a leaked mailbox archive), any unused password reset email contained in that dataset could be used by an attacker to reset the victim's password. The attacker does not need current access to the victim's email account, only access to a previously leaked copy of the reset email.
This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/hexpm/accounts/password_reset.ex and program routines 'Elixir.Hexpm.Accounts.PasswordReset':can_reset?/3.
This issue affects hexpm: from 617e44c71f1dd9043870205f371d375c5c4d886d before bb0e42091995945deef10556f58d046a52eb7884. |
| This High severity RCE (Remote Code Execution) vulnerability was introduced in versions 9.6.0, 10.0.0, 10.1.0, 10.2.0, 11.0.0, 11.1.0, 12.0.0, and 12.1.0 of Bamboo Data Center.
This RCE (Remote Code Execution) vulnerability, with a CVSS Score of 8.6, allows an authenticated attacker to execute malicious code on the remote system.
Atlassian recommends that Bamboo Data Center customers upgrade to latest version, if you are unable to do so, upgrade your instance to one of the specified supported fixed versions:
Bamboo Data Center 9.6: Upgrade to a release greater than or equal to 9.6.24
Bamboo Data Center 10.2: Upgrade to a release greater than or equal to 10.2.16
Bamboo Data Center 12.1: Upgrade to a release greater than or equal to 12.1.3
See the release notes ([https://confluence.atlassian.com/bambooreleases/bamboo-release-notes-1189793869.html]). You can download the latest version of Bamboo Data Center from the download center ([https://www.atlassian.com/software/bamboo/download-archives]).
This vulnerability was reported via our Atlassian (Internal) program. |
| Configuration issue in Java Management Extensions (JMX) in TIBCO BPM Enterprise version 4.x allows unauthorised access. |
| Wazuh is a free and open source platform used for threat prevention, detection, and response. Versions 4.0.0 through 4.14.2 have a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability due to Deserialization of Untrusted Data). All Wazuh deployments using cluster mode (master/worker architecture) and any organization with a compromised worker node (e.g., through initial access, insider threat, or supply chain attack) are impacted. An attacker who gains access to a worker node (through any means) can achieve full RCE on the master node with root privileges. Version 4.14.3 fixes the issue. |
| A vulnerability was identified in code-projects Simple Food Order System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /routers/add-item.php. Such manipulation of the argument price leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. |
| LibreChat RAG API, version 0.7.0, contains a log-injection vulnerability that allows attackers to forge log entries. |
| Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') vulnerability in Subrata Mal TeraWallet – For WooCommerce woo-wallet allows Leveraging Race Conditions.This issue affects TeraWallet – For WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 1.5.15. |
| The Angeet ES3 KVM does not properly sanitize user-supplied variables parsed by the 'cfg.lua' script, allowing an authenticated attacker to execute OS-level commands. |
| The Angeet ES3 KVM allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to write arbitrary files, including configuration files or system binaries. Modified configuration files or system binaries could allow an attacker to take complete control of a vulnerable system. |
| Sipeed NanoKVM before 2.3.1 exposes a Wi-Fi configuration endpoint without proper security checks, allowing an unauthenticated attacker with network access to change the saved configured Wi-Fi network to one of the attacker's choosing, or craft a request to exhaust the system memory and terminate the KVM process. |
| JetKVM before 0.5.4 does not rate limit login requests, enabling brute-force attempts to guess credentials. |
| JetKVM prior to 0.5.4 does not verify the authenticity of downloaded firmware files. An attacker-in-the-middle or a compromised update server could modify the firmware and the corresponding SHA256 hash to pass verification. |
| The GL-iNet Comet (GL-RM1) KVM connects to a GL-iNet site during boot-up to provision client and CA certificates. The GL-RM1 does not verify certificates used for this connection, allowing an attacker-in-the-middle to serve invalid client and CA certificates. The GL-RM1 will attempt to use the invalid certificates and fail to connect to the legitimate GL-iNet KVM cloud service. |
| The GL-iNet Comet (GL-RM1) KVM web interface does not limit login requests, enabling brute-force attempts to guess credentials. |
| The GL-iNet Comet (GL-RM1) KVM does not require authentication on the UART serial console. This attack requires physically opening the device and connecting to the UART pins. |
| The GL-iNet Comet (GL-RM1) KVM does not sufficiently verify the authenticity of uploaded firmware files. An attacker-in-the-middle or a compromised update server could modify the firmware and the corresponding MD5 hash to pass verification. |
| Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected
preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes
the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword.
Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more
preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group
was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares.
This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups,
if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by
the server.
If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to
interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps
adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the
'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups
were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not
sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple
was mutually supported.
As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported
post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's
configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the
only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction).
OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS
1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat'
list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure.
If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server
the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by
the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been
more preferred, if included.
The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly
equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among
the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group
from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares,
the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello
Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group.
The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in
default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the
various desired groups and group 'tuples'.
No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies
outside the FIPS boundary.
OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released.
OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released.
OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue. |
