Export limit exceeded: 337625 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (337625 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1230 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 4.1 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 1.0 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to cause repository downloads to contain different code than displayed in the web interface due to incorrect validation of branch references under certain circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1090 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 8.7 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 10.6 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user, when the `markdown_placeholders` feature flag was enabled, to inject JavaScript in a browser due to improper sanitization of placeholder content in markdown processing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1069 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 7.5 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause a denial of service by sending specially crafted GraphQL requests due to uncontrolled recursion under certain circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0602 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.6 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to disclose metadata from private issues, merge requests, epics, milestones, or commits due to improper filtering in the snippet rendering process under certain circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14513 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 7.5 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.11 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause a denial of service condition due to improper input validation when processing specially crafted JSON payloads in the protected branches API. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13929 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 7.5 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 10.0 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause a denial of service by issuing specially crafted requests to repository archive endpoints under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13690 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.11 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to cause a denial of service condition due to improper input validation on webhook custom header names under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12704 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 3.5 Low |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.2 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to access Virtual Registry data in groups where they are not members due to improper authorization under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12697 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 2.2 Low |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.5 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user with maintainer-role permissions to reveal Datadog API credentials under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12576 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 9.3 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to cause a denial of service due to improper handling of webhook response data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30235 | 1 Opf | 1 Openproject | 2026-03-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| OpenProject is an open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.2.0, this vulnerability occurs due to improper validation of OpenProject’s Markdown rendering, specifically in the hyperlink handling. This allows an attacker to inject malicious hyperlink payloads that perform DOM clobbering. DOM clobbering can crash or blank the entire page by overwriting native DOM functions with HTML elements, causing critical JavaScript calls to throw runtime errors during application initialization and halt further execution. This vulnerability is fixed in 17.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12555 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.1 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user to access previous pipeline job information on projects with repository and CI/CD disabled due to improper authorization checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1524 | 1 Neo4j | 1 Enterprise Edition | 2026-03-12 | N/A |
| An edgecase in SSO implementation in Neo4j Enterprise edition versions prior to version 2026.02 can lead to unauthorised access under the following conditions: If a neo4j admin configures two or more OIDC providers AND configures one or more of them to be an authorization provider AND configures one or more of them to be authentication-only, then those that are authentication-only will also provide authorization. This edgecase becomes a security problem only if the authentication-only provider contains groups which have higher privileges than provided by the intended (configured) authorization provider. When using multiple plugins for authentication and authorisation, prior to the fix the issue could lead to a plugin configured to provide only authentication or authorisation capabilities erroneously providing both capabilities. We recommend upgrading to versions 2026.02 (or 5.26.22) where the issue is fixed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20165 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Cloud Platform, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-03-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.1, 10.0.4, 9.4.9, and 9.3.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.7, 10.1.2507.17, 10.0.2503.12, and 9.3.2411.124, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could retrieve sensitive information by inspecting the job's search log due to improper access control in the MongoClient logging channel. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20164 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Cloud Platform, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-03-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.0, 10.0.3, 9.4.9, and 9.3.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.5, 10.1.2507.16, 10.0.2503.11, and 9.3.2411.123, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could access the `/splunkd/__raw/servicesNS/-/-/configs/conf-passwords` REST API endpoint, which exposes the hashed or plaintext password values that are stored in the passwords.conf configuration file due to improper access control. This vulnerability could allow for the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20166 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Cloud Platform, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-03-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.1 and 10.0.4, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.5, 10.1.2507.16, and 10.0.2503.12, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could retrieve the Observability Cloud API access token through the Discover Splunk Observability Cloud app due to improper access control. This vulnerability does not affect Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.9 and 9.3.10 because the Discover Splunk Observability Cloud app does not come with Splunk Enterprise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20162 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Cloud Platform, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-03-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.0, 10.0.3, 9.4.9, and 9.3.9, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.4, 10.1.2507.15, 10.0.2503.11, and 9.3.2411.123, a low-privileged user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could craft a malicious payload when creating a View (Settings - User Interface - Views) at the `/manager/launcher/data/ui/views/_new` endpoint leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) through a path traversal vulnerability. This could result in execution of unauthorized JavaScript code in the browser of a user. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The authenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20163 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Cloud Platform, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-03-12 | 8 High |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.0, 10.0.4, 9.4.9, and 9.3.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.5, 10.0.2503.12, 10.1.2507.16, and 9.3.2411.124, a user who holds a role that contains the high-privilege capability `edit_cmd` could execute arbitrary shell commands using the `unarchive_cmd` parameter for the `/splunkd/__upload/indexing/preview` REST endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30236 | 1 Opf | 1 Openproject | 2026-03-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| OpenProject is an open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.2.0, when editing a project budget and planning the labor cost, it was not checked that the user that was planned in the budget is actually a project member. This exposed the user's default rate (if one was set up) to users that should only see that information for project members. Also, the endpoint that handles the pre-calculation for the frontend to display a preview of the costs, while it was being entered, did not properly validate the membership of the user as well. This also allowed to calculate costs with the default rate of non-members. This vulnerability is fixed in 17.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30239 | 1 Opf | 1 Openproject | 2026-03-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| OpenProject is an open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.2.0, when budgets are deleted, the work packages that were assigned to this budget need to be moved to a different budget. This action was performed before the permission check on the delete action was executed. This allowed all users in the application to delete work package budget assignments. This vulnerability is fixed in 17.2.0. | ||||