| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. In versions up to and including 2.4, three `nutritional_values` action endpoints fetch objects via `Model.objects.get(pk=pk)` — a raw ORM call that bypasses the user-scoped queryset. Any authenticated user can read another user's private nutrition plan data, including caloric intake and full macro breakdown, by supplying an arbitrary PK. Commit 29876a1954fe959e4b58ef070170e81703dab60e contains a fix for the issue. |
| An OS command injection
vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an
authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by
injecting malicious input into the devices field of the firmware update
update action to achieve remote code execution. |
| An arbitrary file-read vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1
and prior, enabling unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files on
the system, and potentially causing a denial-of-service attack. |
| wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Five routine detail action endpoints check a cache before calling `self.get_object()`. In versions up to and including 2.4, ache keys are scoped only by `pk` — no user ID is included. When a victim has previously accessed their routine via the API, an attacker can retrieve the cached response for the same PK without any ownership check. Commit e964328784e2ee2830a1991d69fadbce86ac9fbf contains a patch for the issue. |
| WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling
attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate
data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the
OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station
identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger.
Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege
escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and
corruption of charging network data reported to the backend. |
| The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on
the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may
allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing
or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force
attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling
attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate
data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the
OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station
identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger.
Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege
escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and
corruption of charging network data reported to the backend. |
| The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on
the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may
allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing
or misrouting legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force
attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on
the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may
allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing
or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force
attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely
associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the
same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable
session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where
the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and
receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability
may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a
malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming
the backend with valid session requests. |
| WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling
attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate
data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the
OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station
identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger.
Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege
escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and
corruption of charging network data reported to the backend. |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in Copeland XWEB Pro
version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling any attackers to bypass the
authentication requirement and achieve pre-authenticated code execution
on the system. |
| A stack based buffer overflow exists in an API route of XWEB Pro version
1.12.1 and prior, enabling unauthenticated attackers to cause stack
corruption and a termination of the program. |
| The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on
the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may
allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing
or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force
attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| An OS command injection
vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an
authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by
injecting malicious input into the devices field when accessing the get
setup route, leading to remote code execution. |
| An OS command injection
vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an
authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by
injecting malicious input into the Wi-Fi SSID and/or password fields
can lead to remote code execution when the configuration is processed. |
| An OS command injection
vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an
authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by
injecting malicious input into the server username and/or password
fields of the restore action in the API V1 route. |
| The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on
the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may
allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing
or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force
attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling
attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate
data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the
OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station
identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger.
Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege
escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and
corruption of charging network data reported to the backend. |
| The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely
associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the
same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable
session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where
the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and
receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability
may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a
malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming
the backend with valid session requests. |
