Search

Search Results (338365 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-31916 2 Iulia Cazan, Wordpress 2 Latest Post Shortcode, Wordpress 2026-03-16 5.3 Medium
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Iulia Cazan Latest Post Shortcode latest-post-shortcode allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Latest Post Shortcode: from n/a through <= 14.2.1.
CVE-2026-25823 1 Hms-networks 2 Ewon Cosy, Ewon Flexy 2026-03-16 9.8 Critical
HMS Networks Ewon Flexy with firmware before 15.0s4, Cosy+ with firmware 22.xx before 22.1s6, and Cosy+ with firmware 23.xx before 23.0s3 have a stack buffer overflow that leads to a Denial of Service, which can also be exploited to achieve Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution.
CVE-2026-24097 1 Checkmk 1 Checkmk 2026-03-16 N/A
Improper permission enforcement in Checkmk versions 2.4.0 before 2.4.0p23, 2.3.0 before 2.3.0p43, and 2.2.0 (EOL) allows authenticated users to enumerate existing hosts by observing different HTTP response codes in agent-receiver/register_existing endpoint, which could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2026-32329 2 Ays Pro, Wordpress 2 Advanced Related Posts, Wordpress 2026-03-16 5.3 Medium
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Ays Pro Advanced Related Posts advanced-related-posts allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Advanced Related Posts: from n/a through <= 1.9.1.
CVE-2026-2673 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2026-03-16 3.1 Low
Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.
CVE-2026-32306 1 Oneuptime 1 Oneuptime 2026-03-16 10 Critical
OneUptime is a solution for monitoring and managing online services. Prior to 10.0.23, the telemetry aggregation API accepts user-controlled aggregationType, aggregateColumnName, and aggregationTimestampColumnName parameters and interpolates them directly into ClickHouse SQL queries via the .append() method (documented as "trusted SQL"). There is no allowlist, no parameterized query binding, and no input validation. An authenticated user can inject arbitrary SQL into ClickHouse, enabling full database read (including telemetry data from all tenants), data modification, and potential remote code execution via ClickHouse table functions. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.0.23.
CVE-2026-25818 1 Hms-networks 2 Ewon Cosy, Ewon Flexy 2026-03-16 9.1 Critical
HMS Networks Ewon Flexy with firmware before 15.0s4, Cosy+ with firmware 22.xx before 22.1s6, and Cosy+ with firmware 23.xx before 23.0s3 have weak entropy for authentication cookies, allowing an attacker with a stolen session cookie to find the user password by brute-forcing an encryption parameter.
CVE-2026-25819 1 Hms-networks 2 Ewon Cosy, Ewon Flexy 2026-03-16 7.5 High
HMS Networks Ewon Flexy with firmware before 15.0s4, Cosy+ with firmware 22.xx before 22.1s6, and Cosy+ with firmware 23.xx before 23.0s3 allows unauthenticated attackers to cause a Denial of Service by using a specially crafted HTTP request that leads to a reboot of the device, provided they have access to the device's GUI.
CVE-2026-31798 1 Jumpserver 1 Jumpserver 2026-03-16 5 Medium
JumpServer is an open source bastion host and an operation and maintenance security audit system. Prior to v4.10.16-lts, JumpServer improperly validates certificates in the Custom SMS API Client. When JumpServer sends MFA/OTP codes via Custom SMS API, an attacker can intercept the request and capture the verification code BEFORE it reaches the user's phone. This vulnerability is fixed in v4.10.16-lts.
CVE-2026-31882 1 Dagu-org 1 Dagu 2026-03-16 7.5 High
Dagu is a workflow engine with a built-in Web user interface. Prior to 2.2.4, when Dagu is configured with HTTP Basic authentication (DAGU_AUTH_MODE=basic), all Server-Sent Events (SSE) endpoints are accessible without any credentials. This allows unauthenticated attackers to access real-time DAG execution data, workflow configurations, execution logs, and queue status — bypassing the authentication that protects the REST API. The buildStreamAuthOptions() function builds authentication options for SSE/streaming endpoints. When the auth mode is basic, it returns an auth.Options struct with BasicAuthEnabled: true but AuthRequired defaults to false (Go zero value). The authentication middleware at internal/service/frontend/auth/middleware.go allows unauthenticated requests when AuthRequired is false. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.4.
CVE-2026-31919 2 Josh Kohlbach, Wordpress 2 Advanced Coupons For Woocommerce Coupons, Wordpress 2026-03-16 4.3 Medium
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Josh Kohlbach Advanced Coupons for WooCommerce Coupons advanced-coupons-for-woocommerce-free allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Advanced Coupons for WooCommerce Coupons: from n/a through <= 4.7.1.
CVE-2026-32328 2 Shufflehound, Wordpress 2 Lemmony, Wordpress 2026-03-16 5.4 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in shufflehound Lemmony lemmony allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Lemmony: from n/a through < 1.7.1.
CVE-2026-0956 1 Digilent 1 Dasylab 2026-03-16 7.8 High
There is a memory corruption vulnerability due to an out-of-bounds read when loading a corrupted file in Digilent DASYLab.  This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted file. This vulnerability affects all versions of Digilent DASYLab.
CVE-2025-13718 1 Ibm 1 Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 2026-03-16 3.7 Low
IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.2.3.0 through 6.2.3.5 and 6.2.4.0 through 6.2.4.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information in cleartext in a communication channel that can be sniffed by unauthorized actors.
CVE-2025-13726 1 Ibm 1 Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 2026-03-16 5.3 Medium
IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.2.3.0 through 6.2.3.5 and 6.2.4.0 through 6.2.4.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when detailed technical error messages are returned. This information could be used in further attacks against the system.
CVE-2026-0835 1 Ibm 1 Sterling B2b Integrator 2026-03-16 5.4 Medium
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_1, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_1, and 6.2.2.0 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
CVE-2023-40693 1 Ibm 1 Sterling B2b Integrator 2026-03-16 5.4 Medium
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_1, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_1 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
CVE-2025-13723 1 Ibm 1 Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 2026-03-16 5.3 Medium
IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.2.3.0 through 6.2.3.5 and 6.2.4.0 through 6.2.4.2 could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive user information using an expired access token
CVE-2025-13777 1 Abb 2 Awin Gw100 Rev.2, Awin Gw120 2026-03-16 8.3 High
Authentication bypass by capture-replay vulnerability in ABB AWIN GW100 rev.2, ABB AWIN GW120.This issue affects AWIN GW100 rev.2: 2.0-0, 2.0-1; AWIN GW120: 1.2-0, 1.2-1.
CVE-2025-36368 1 Ibm 1 Sterling B2b Integrator 2026-03-16 6.5 Medium
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_1, and 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_1 are vulnerable to SQL injection. An administrative user could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database.